Welfare State Develop in Canada-Free Samples-Myassignmenthelp.com

Questions: 1.How did the welfare state develop in Canada. 2.How was this different than in the United States? 3.How did democracy eventually deliver? Answers: 1.The welfare state of Canada was developed subject to the powerful influence that it had over the business. This influence maintained a very close relationship with the federal government and remained unfazed on the fact regarding whether the Conservative or the Liberal party was in power at a given point of time. The welfare state always rested on the tension that was present between the two systems of decision-making (Langille, 2016). These two decision-making systems included the capitalist marketplace and the democratic government. The political system of Canada may have been described as a system that allowed accommodation of the elite. The welfare state was described to be able to confront the challenges that were posed by the factors of communism and fascism. This would have been possible if the political and social conditions of the concerned area were favorable. There had been a sufficient democratic pressure during the time span ranging from the 1940s to the 1970s. This le d to the Canadian state gaining more autonomy from the capital that it had enjoyed in the past. 2.The Canadian welfare state is known to differ from the United States in a number of ways. The Canadian political system have been known to be a tool of the populist sentiment, in spite of the elaborate system of balances and checks that have been used to circumscribe the power of the state of America. The Canadian business, unlike the United States have never been subjected to the strict anti-combines system of legislation (Langille, 2016). The Canadian state seemingly lays less focus on the merits of the free competition. The Canadian State is also seen to provide less support to the system of the organized labor. The Canadian nationals enjoy an extensive welfare state, which has been supportive of or has beholden to the concerned business. This may be the result of the fact that the state depended on the support that was provided by a concentrated community of the corporate sector. This community had been closely linked to the London and New York capitals rather than the workers who were based in Canada. 3.In these conditions, the common working people have to be organized and mobilized to perform in a collective manner provided they wanted to possess political powers. This would in turn help the democracy to run in a smooth manner. There had been an upsurge in the activities of the democracy after the Great Depression and the World War II. The labor rights to collective bargaining were secured by the labor movement. Thus, they were able to enjoy the share of the increasing productivity. The open nature of the Canadian economy did not allow the concerned government to maintain a steady growth, rise in the incomes and full employment. The civil rights struggle had broken out in the mean time in the country, which had been followed by the movements of environment, anti-war movements and the struggles for the rights of the women. Reports claimed that huge number of demands were being placed on the government due to the excessive practice of democracy (Langille, 2016). Reference Langille, D. (2016). Follow the money: How business and politics define our health.D. Raphael (3rd ed.) Social determinants of health: Canadian perspective, 470-490.